Conquer 2026 General Paper (GP) A Levels Essay Questions

GP Essay Questions from 2026 A Levels

 

 

1. Examine the view that the main responsibility individuals have is to themselves.

2. Examine the claim that good films always change the way people view the world.

3. How far do you agree that the monitoring of online activity is essential?

4.  ‘With leisure travel increasing, environmentally sustainable tourism is impossible.’ To what extent do you agree?

5. ‘Countries where people speak more than one language experience only advantages.’ Discuss.

6. How successful is your society in encouraging greater involvement in the arts?

7. ‘What people wear establishes their identity.’ Assess this view.

8. ‘The development of science and technology is limited only by human imagination.’ Evaluate this claim.

 

Poll (Which question did you attempt): Indicate in the Telegram poll!

If you want more Tips for GP, do also join this free Telegram channel which would share very helpful Tips, FAQs, and update you when articles are updated/posted ‎😃

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

General Insights:

 

Interestingly, like 2025, I feel that the 2026 questions are a giveaway. In particular, the new syllabus has a very clear focus even as they narrow it to 8 questions, which is great. Are they really easy this year? Yes! Because they are super standard. But what does standard even mean? Well, standard = we would have logically prepared for this kind of question in our content, based on past year question trends. Mastering Standard questions require thinking about not just Themes, but the specific Topics/Issues that are commonly tested for a Theme. Preparing correctly would mean we have tons of options no matter what questions come out.

Strategies = Content + Skills. This two-pronged is exactly what we focus on at ZAscension, helping students acquiring specific Thematic+Topical knowledge while developing extensive skills that will greatly enhance the quality of essays.

Here is the spread of 2026 questions according to Themes:

Arts (1): Q2, Q6, Q7*

Individual & Values (2): Q1, Q7*

Politics (2): Q5*

Sci & Tech (1): Q8

Environment (1): Q4

Media (1): Q3

General (0): None! This is a good indication that Cambridge is really consolidating their focus on the main Themes that I have always recommended since even 10 years back. Note that these may not be what schools go through, but they remain the main Themes for GP that we should care about. You may consider our Content lessons if you need extra help 🙂

* = Partially related to the Theme, but not a complete fit (requires additional knowledge apart from the standard arguments and examples we learn for that Theme)

Relatively standard questions from major Themes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8

Questions that are non-standard but still easier to write: 0

Difficult Questions (too niche / many modifiers): 5, 7

Read the analysis below for more details on why these are classified as such! To be clear, difficult questions do not immediately mean we won’t do well. It just means that it takes more for the essay to address question requirements, but if pulled off well, can still be a great piece!

Studying for GP Content through Major Themes is highly recommended

I have always been sharing with students that my approach in Content Knowledge for GP resides in preparing for major themes. It gives us a systematic method of acquiring knowledge that we would need and ensures that our knowledge can directly be applied to questions. Though the syllabus has changed in 2024 and there are only 8 questions. The 2025 and 2026 GP A Levels have confirmed the importance of these major themes. The themes stated above are precisely the ones I have identified all along, and you can see that’s how we organise all the past year Prelim and A Level questions too (also aligning with how I design my crash course and weekly lessons).

For easy access, here are the links to other past year questions organised based on Themes: 2025 A Levels, 2024 A Levels, 2023 A Levels, 2022 A Levels, 2021 A Levels, 2020 A Levels, 2019 A Levels | 2026 Prelims, 2025 Prelims, 2024 Prelims, 2023 Prelims, 2022 Prelims, 2021 Prelims, 2020 Prelims, Prelims Compilation from different years

Out of the 8 questions, all 8 of them belong to the major themes (First time ever – all questions come from major themes wow. There is a consistent trend). This is why it is important to be strategic and focus on these major themes instead of working on other niche topics. 

The insight from here is that the dominant GP strategy is to take a focused approach in developing a critical understanding of these Themes and the associated issues found in them. Students who have specialised and comprehensive knowledge about a specific theme are always rewarded with questions that directly apply their knowledge.

Embracing less popular Themes. and preparing for several key Themes

This year’s A Levels is easy once again (just like 2025), one of the easiest years I have seen in fact (which means the upcoming years will definitely be tougher since we already had 2 consecutively easy years, or perhaps it just means the requirements are clearer and students who work on the major themes will be rewarded). It’s easy because many questions are highly predictable. They very nicely fall into the key standard topics from the major Themes. Each Major Theme has 7 standard topics that represent 90% of possible questions. If you are interested to know how to address these topics, you need to join our lessons because we have key arguments and examples for all these. It affirms my strategy for GP, which is to prepare for content in a specialised and targeted way. Sci & Tech is usually difficult in recent years, but this year’s question is average, not overly complex (Q8 considering whether imagination alone can  transcend everything for Sci & Tech). The Media question is also standard and easy, aligning with key trends in the world (Q3 looking at the pros-cons of regulating online activity). Politics is in fact the Theme with the hardest question this year (Q5 on multilingualism).

Beyond that, themes that are less popular with students (but what I always tell my students to focus on), are prominent as usual – Arts, Individuals & Values! Q1 ‘responsibility individuals have’ marks the 5th consecutive year where questions either partially or entirely test Activism (people fighting for change in society, and caring about causes larger than oneself). The insight here is that some types of questions can very much repeat year after year; the key is of course knowing which ones. How did I know to prepare students for these kinds of questions? I have analysed 2000+ questions from Prelims and A Levels to be able to understand common questions that commonly feature in the exams 🙂 This is why I am extremely confident in my teaching approach for GP because content I share is always applicable to specific essay questions, and not just general knowledge about random things in the world.

Individuals & Values is a Theme I (Mr Zach) created upon analysing question trends, and it is not something that schools typically cover. I created this Theme when I saw huge similarities in questions that can be categorised under here, and it is also something I cover extensively in my yearly Essay Content Crash Course (find out more here). Indv & Values is a great theme to look into because of how frequently it comes out and how simple it is to learn this Theme. It also often synergises well with other Themes (Q2’s idea about changing the world also relates to activism | Q5’s multilingualism also includes ideas of diversity and inclusivity | Q7’s clothes and identity deal with non-conformity and personal values). For more information on this Theme, please refer to the past year questions (links provided both in the above paragraph, and all the way below this article). 

GP preparation requires us to specialise in at least 4 of the 6 major Themes, and of course to look at the right topics within those, so that our knowledge can be easily applied to actual questions. Many of my students also love the Arts questions because both are very standard questions – (Q2 looks at the value of films while Q6 discusses efforts to promote the arts in Singapore) (Q7 is not directly linked but students who are good at the Arts would still be able to tweak their knowledge to answer this because the arts, as a theme, is very interested in issues relating to identity, acceptance, expression). If you have always been averse to Arts, this is a sign that you must reconsider. 3/8 questions basically mastering the Arts alone is already powerful enough to prepare you for nearly half the available options!

Environment has also returned for another year, this time with a standard question too (tensions between environment and economy, in this case tourism in Q4). This is a simple question that requires us to consider how to navigate these tensions and which to prioritise. Many typical case studies discussed in Environment essays can be used here.

I think it is a very clear signal that A Levels GP has clear content trends and can be effectively studied for. In fact, the existence of such standard questions would mean the disparity would be very huge, between students who prepare well and students who don’t. Students who have no proper strategy for content and only rely on school lectures would also have little confidence in answering A Level questions, even when they are easy. Specialising becomes even more critical for the new syllabus because you can see that all the questions this year are extremely focused. If you did random issues like crime, family or education, you will be stumped by the questions. 

I would like to add that the new syllabus actually has the exact same questions as the old one, except that the old one has another 4 extra questions. This effectively shows us that all the question trends from the past years are still very relevant because content for GP has not changed!

Skills are important to help us address varied questions requirements

Question requirements are often complex with modifiers (additional requirements) and there could even be more than one modifier. 

Interestingly, 7 out of 8 questions this year have at least 1 modifier, and some questions even have multiple variables (aligns with recent A Level trends). This demonstrates the importance of properly analysing questions such that we sufficiently address all the additional requirements 🙂

Q1: Absolute (main) | Q2: Absolute (always change) | Q3: Extent | Q4: Absolute (impossible), Extent, Context (leisure travel increasing) | Q5: Absolute (only advantages) | Q6: Context (in your society) | Q7: None 🙂 | Q8: Absolute (only)

Context: Q4, 6| Absolute: Q1, 2, 4,5 , 8| Variables: Implied in Q1 and Q5 | Extent: Q3, 4

Here is a quick summary of the skills needed (CAVE):

Context = Examples and arguments need to reflect the context/condition and not just ignore it. This includes ‘in your society’ questions because they are only looking at the specific context of Singapore (Q6). The features that define Singapore uniquely must be discussed in the Point; it is not just about using SG examples. The essay must feel like it is doing a very detailed analysis of the local context, rather than apply generic arguments to SG.

Absolute = One view needs to express the absolute. The other view questions the absolute by looking at its limitations or by considering other alternatives to it. For example, for Q1, Agree =  main responsibility to self, Disagree = responsibility should go beyond self. Take note only 1 view has the absolute, not both views. With reference to Q2, Agree = Always change, but we would not say Disagree = Never change (it is more of good films need not necessarily do that, rather than they never ever do that or shouldn’t do that). 

Variables = Both variables always have to be addressed together. They are no longer important individually, but relatively (to each other). This is one of the most challenging modifiers to address because a lot more need to be explained. We have to remember to always keep a vigilant lookout for the existence of such additional requirements, instead of eagerly jumping into thinking of points! Look at the following section for more details. This cannot be easily summarised here, but simply put all arguments and examples now must include a comparative element. Comparison happens within each BP, not across.

Extent = Need to show how both views could be valid to a degree. Avoid phrases like ‘I agree to a small/large/certain extent’ because they are too vague. Instead, give the specific extent of why you have chosen one view over the other. For example in Q3, a possible stand would be: ‘While regulating digital activities can help to safeguard public security, it also opens up risks of it becoming just an excuse. In reality, governments could exploit the situation to use surveillance as a form of control’. This would signal that the dominant view is ‘Disagree’ (= disagree to a large extent, but phrased in a much more evaluative and specific manner).

Questions with multiple variables are common curve balls

Q1: Environment

With regard to forced comparison absolutes that require us to discuss other variables, the key to addressing them is to understand that the Scope of our essay has expanded into additional areas of concern. Q8 needs us to think about how these variables interact when we say Sci Tech is not only limited by imagination. What are the other variables limiting Sci & Tech? Why might these be more important than imagination? Why would imagination not overcome these variables?.

Multiple variables questions are harder because we have additional requirements to consider. Note that every single body paragraph (BP) needs to address both variables and compare them. The common mistake is to separately discuss them across different paragraphs; it is problematic because the arguments would lack the comparative element.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you want more Tips for GP, do also join this free Telegram channel which would share very helpful Tips, FAQs, and update you when articles are updated/posted ‎😃In 2025, I have also created a huge Example database + arguments + model essay plans, all found on my Substack

Specific Analysis:

I will be analysing each question for their unique requirements, highlighting some pertinent issues, and sharing possible arguments. Disclaimer: these would of course not be the only points that are accepted. If you thought of a different point, it might be a strong argument too, don’t worry just because it is not found here. I just wanted to share some points to open up perspectives on how we can approach these different questions.

This year I am giving more emphasis to the part about Tweaking. Tweaking is a highly advanced skill I teach my students, where we adapt arguments and examples from model essays we are familiar with (those that I have written) and then apply them to tons of different questions. This works when we can identify similarities, while also accounting for differences that would change how we frame our arguments so that they can ATQ! It will be in the last section of every question below. I am also adding a brand new section on ‘Insights’ to explain key learning points from how I develop my points.

I have also included a part of ‘why it exists and what it entails’ to unpack the intricacies of every question and explain the larger context around it. Cogitating on this question allows us to more critically examine the issue to consider the tensions that exist within and identify the central concerns. This year, I am also adding a new section for ‘Rating’ to discuss how challenging a question is. For simplicity, I will also have 2 categories of either ‘difficult’ or ‘standard’.

1. Examine the view that the main responsibility individuals have is to themselves. | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: This a super standard question for Indv Values as part of the sub-topic of selflessness. Importantly, it also links to another Indv Values topic that has been coming out consecutively: Activism. 2 very standard topics are tested in this question 🙂
  This is one of the questions I would recommend the most because of how straightforward it is. It captures the predictable tension between needing to be more self-centered (for their own success and happiness – which are btw another 2 major topics under the Theme of Indv Values) and wanting to be more altruistic. If you’re a J1 or J2 reading this and haven’t taken the exam, hopefully this is the clearest sign you should consider the Theme I invented – Indv Values (you will find more info on this in all my other articles, or you can directly master this through our lessons)
  
• Agree (No countries should sacrifice) = 1. Individual success, consequences – While individuals may have obligations towards their families and wider communities, these should not come at the expense of taking ownership of their own futures. Ultimately, others can offer support or guidance, but cannot make consequential decisions on one’s behalf or bear the long-term repercussions of those choices. Expecting individuals to place collective needs above their own aspirations can therefore foster dependency and abdication of personal responsibility. One’s foremost obligation should be to ensure that one’s own life is not left to the mercy of others. | 2. Preserving personal well-being – Individuals must prioritise their own happiness and well-being because these are fundamental to leading a fulfilling and sustainable life. The expectation that one should continually sacrifice personal needs for the benefit of others risks reducing one’s existence to an endless fulfilment of external obligations, leaving little room for personal fulfilment or genuine contentment. Even ostensibly noble acts of altruism become hollow when individuals are chronically unhappy or emotionally depleted. One cannot meaningfully champion the happiness of others whilst perpetually denying oneself the same consideration.
• Insight: Note that these points MUST COMPARE with the alternative (responsibility to others), and explain why self is more important – because the question has the forced comparison absolute modifier “main”. These points come from standard arguments about the role individuals play in their own success and happiness (both of which are Topics under Indv Values).
• Disagree (Not Able to Solve) =
• 1. Moral obligation against injustice – There are circumstances in which individuals have a moral obligation to intervene in the suffering or injustice experienced by others, even when doing so offers them no personal benefit. If self-interest were always paramount, individuals could conveniently justify remaining indifferent to exploitation, discrimination or human suffering simply because these problems do not directly affect them. Such moral disengagement would reduce responsibility to a transactional exercise, stripping society of the compassion and conscience necessary to protect the vulnerable. Our obligations to others must therefore sometimes supersede our own convenience and interests. | 2. Transcending self-interest for collective progress – Many of humanity’s most pressing challenges cannot be resolved through individuals pursuing their own interests independently. Climate change, widening inequality and public health crises demand collective sacrifices that may offer little immediate personal gratification but are indispensable to securing a better future. If individuals consistently prioritise their own short-term interests, the collective action necessary to address these challenges will inevitably falter. Indeed, certain responsibilities towards future generations and the wider community demand that individuals look beyond their immediate needs and accept obligations to a cause greater than themselves.
• Insight: Both of these arguments are standard ideas for the value of activism, with D1 focusing more on human rights and ethics whereas D2 looks at societal progress and problem-solving (allowing us to tweak from Sci Tech arguments too).
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays on Indv Values :), because this is an extremely standard question that is incredibly common both in Prelims and the A Levels. Join us if you want to find out more about these insightful trends, and easily prepare for the most important questions 🙂 Note: these model essays I am referring to are those that I write and share with ZAscension students.
• [P.s. J1 and J2 students who are reading this, if you haven’t taken the exam, then you should absolutely consider joining our lessons to learn all these standard arguments to easily ace GP. It will help you realise how predictable GP can be, and how manageable content truly is!]

2. Examine the claim that good films always change the way people view the world.  | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: This is also a highly recommended question for Arts. Arts has 2 questions this year, which is again why I always encourage students to master this Theme even if schools do not typically discuss the arts much. 
• Film is also a very common specific art form from the entire spectrum of the arts. 12 years ago, in 2014, I was a student writing a similar question on films and escapism, 12 years later it’s fun to see this appearing again 🙂
• This is an easy question that basically considers the value of films, but we do need to do a bit of tweaking to make sure we address “always change people’s view of the world”, addressing the absolute of “always” as well
• The debate is always about whether films are just for entertainment and escapism, or whether they actually do much more than that to engender meaningful impact. The preferred stand is the positive one that allows us to celebrate the strengths of films (this is the common view from academic, cultured, intellectual perspectives, and essays score better if they express this)
• Will write 5 points for this just because I have a sentimental value towards this haha (and would also recommend agreeing)
• Agree (Only well-known works are great) = 1. Challenging entrenched social perceptions (view about others) – Remarkable film masterpieces invariably expose audiences to social realities that are otherwise distant from their everyday experiences, forcing them to confront prejudices they may have unconsciously accepted. By humanising marginalised communities and portraying the consequences of discrimination, cinema makes abstract social issues more tangible and difficult to dismiss. This is particularly powerful because audiences are invited to experience these realities through the perspectives of those affected, rather than merely receiving detached information. In doing so, films can dismantle stereotypes and cultivate a more empathetic understanding of the world. | 2. Exposure to new realities (view about the world’s circumstances) – Critically acclaimed films inevitably seek to broaden the intellectual horizons of its audience, allowing them to encounter perspectives and experiences beyond the confines of their immediate environment. By immersing viewers in unfamiliar cultures, historical circumstances and socioeconomic realities, cinema challenges the assumption that one’s own experiences constitute a universal frame of reference. This capacity to expand one’s understanding is indispensable to good filmmaking, since a film that leaves audiences entirely confined to their existing worldview has arguably squandered one of cinema’s greatest strengths: its ability to make the unfamiliar comprehensible. | 3. Deeper moral and intellectual reflection, introspection (view about our roles and responsibilities in the world, as well as philosophical ideals) – Good films realise that entertainment is but a means to a more meaningful end; they should leave audiences questioning the assumptions and values through which they navigate the world. Through morally complex characters, uncomfortable dilemmas and competing perspectives, accomplished filmmakers compel viewers to reconsider convictions they may previously have taken for granted. This capacity to provoke introspection distinguishes meaningful cinema from disposable entertainment, since audiences emerge with a more nuanced understanding of issues they might otherwise have approached simplistically. A film’s ability to transform how people evaluate the world is thus integral to its artistic merit.
• Insight: All arguments here not only discuss the value of films, but also how and what exactly it changes about people’s perception of the world (which can include the environment and conditions that exist, empathy for others, their roles in the world).
• Disagree (Undesirable) = 1. Technical and creative achievements – A film’s quality should not be judged solely by its ability to reshape audiences’ worldviews, but also by its artistic craftsmanship and creative ingenuity. The ingenuity of its cinematography, the sophistication of its editing, the originality of its screenplay and the director’s ability to construct a compelling visual language can independently distinguish a film as an exceptional work of art. Expecting every good film to transform people’s perceptions risks reducing cinema to a vehicle for social instruction, overlooking the intrinsic artistic merit of filmmaking itself. | 2. Emotional resonance and personal enjoyment – Cinema also serves the important purpose of providing audiences with enjoyment, escapism and emotional release, none of which necessarily requires a fundamental shift in their worldview. Particularly amid the pressures of modern life, audiences may turn to films simply to experience laughter, excitement or temporary relief from their everyday anxieties. These experiences are not necessarily intellectually transformative, but they can nevertheless make cinema deeply worthwhile. A film should not be considered inferior simply because it prioritises entertaining its audience over challenging their existing perceptions. To limit good films to a single criterion is to ignore the subjective value people derive from the arts.
• Insight: The wrong view for disagree is to just discuss why films may not be able to change and fixate on the limitations. The nuance is to still defend that it remains a good film even if it does not change people’s view. In other words, the argument is that other functions can still contribute to a good film.
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays on Arts 🙂 Just like Q1, this is what I would highly recommend, and what most of our ZA students would attempt too because they will score highly for this!
• [P.s. J1 and J2 students who are reading this, if you haven’t taken the exam, then you should absolutely consider joining our lessons to learn all these standard arguments to easily ace GP. Fr, GP isn’t stressful, I got the tips and hacks you need!]

3. How far do you agree that the monitoring of online activity is essential? | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: This is a fun question too. It is an interesting spin on the more classical question that looks at regulation of the media. This one shifts the focus to the internet and specifically regulation by monitoring. It should not be simply equated to censorship (which is more specific and more extreme).
• It is part of the wider discussion (also what I emphasised in the 2026 prelim trends if you read my analysis) on governments seeking to do a lot more to mitigate the harms of social media and the internet environment, especially on youths (but this question’s scope is of course not just youths)
• On the one hand, it is essential as a way to manage some of the dangers online but on the other hand, it may in fact lead to other problems (or you can also discuss why it may not be as effective, although this is not one of my points below).
• Agree (Monitoring is essential) = 1. Safeguarding individuals from online harms – The relative anonymity and reach of the internet have created opportunities for malicious actors to exploit individuals on an unprecedented scale. From online grooming and financial scams to cyberbullying and identity theft, harmful interactions can escalate rapidly while perpetrators exploit the difficulty of identifying and apprehending them. Monitoring online activity is therefore essential in detecting suspicious behaviour, identifying emerging threats and enabling timely intervention before individuals suffer irreversible harm. Without adequate oversight, the very accessibility that makes digital spaces valuable can also leave users dangerously exposed. | 2. Protecting societal stability and public security – Digital platforms have become powerful channels through which malicious actors can manipulate public opinion, incite hostility and undermine social cohesion. The speed at which misinformation and inflammatory content circulate means that falsehoods can gain traction before authorities or the public have the opportunity to verify them. This is particularly dangerous in an increasingly polarised world, where coordinated disinformation campaigns can exploit existing divisions and erode trust in public institutions. Scrutinising online activity is thus necessary to identify coordinated manipulation and contain threats before they destabilise the wider society.  
• Insight: The important strategy here is to ensure the points are not eg-driven. Eg-driven = we just argue an entire point around one single issue. For instance, we say that monitoring is needed to prevent terrorism, or to prevent cyberbullying. These are egs that can be woven into an essay, but the points must still be logic-driven, basically broader ideas that can encompass different points. Good arguments are always more conceptual and extrapolated further.
• Disagree (Monitoring is not essential) = 1. Preventing abuse of surveillance powers – Granting governments and private corporations extensive access to people’s digital activities creates opportunities for these powers to be abused, particularly when oversight mechanisms are weak. Information originally collected to prevent crime or safeguard public security can be repurposed to target political opponents, suppress dissent or advance commercial interests. The danger is especially pronounced because digital surveillance can be conducted on an enormous scale, often without individuals knowing what information has been collected or how it is being used. Consequently, measures intended to protect society may instead become instruments through which powerful institutions consolidate control over it. | 2. Encourage open discourse and freedom of expression – Constant scrutiny of online communications can discourage individuals from expressing controversial opinions, challenging prevailing narratives or participating in politically sensitive discussions. When people fear that their statements may be monitored, misconstrued or used against them, self-censorship becomes an increasingly attractive form of self-preservation. This is particularly damaging in societies where digital platforms provide important spaces for dissent and public debate, allowing marginalised voices to challenge established power structures. An internet that is excessively monitored may therefore become one where conformity is rewarded and meaningful public discourse is stifled.
• Insight: Every GP question always has 1 positive view and 1 negative view, and realising that makes thinking of arguments way more intuitive. For instance, the view here is actually thinking about the negative problems that come with online monitoring.
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays 🙂 If you are wondering: how can everything come from your model essays? Well it’s because each of my model essay is carefully curated to answer a key question that is very prominent in the A Levels, and this comes from analysing 3000+ questions all my life, and constantly updating it to ongoing trends! 
• [P.s. J1 and J2 students who are reading this, if you haven’t taken the exam, then you should absolutely consider joining our lessons to learn all these standard arguments to easily ace GP. GP is lk easy, I gotchu.]

4. ‘With leisure travel increasing, environmentally sustainable tourism is impossible.’ To what extent do you agree? | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: Standard debate examining tensions between wanting economic gains and also environmental conservation. ‘Impossible’ would mean that they are entirely mutually exclusive whereas challenging this view could suggest some form of c0-existence or alternative solutions to mitigate the issue.
• It would help to think of this like a tug of war – what would stakeholders wanting to gain from tourism push for? What would environmentalists push for?
• Agree (Env sustainable tourism is impossible) = 1. Ecological destruction from tourism concentration – The relentless concentration of tourists in environmentally sensitive destinations inevitably places immense pressure on ecosystems that have limited capacity to withstand human interference. The construction of resorts, expansion of transport infrastructure and escalating consumption of local resources can destroy habitats, deplete water supplies and disrupt ecological balances. Even responsible individual behaviour cannot fully offset the cumulative damage generated by millions of visitors occupying the same spaces. Given that many destinations depend economically on tourism, imposing sufficiently restrictive visitor limits becomes politically and economically difficult, rendering the preservation of fragile environments alongside ever-growing tourist numbers increasingly untenable. | 2. Conflict Between profitability and sustainability – The tourism industry is fundamentally driven by the pursuit of visitor numbers, profitability and continuous economic expansion, creating an inherent conflict with environmental preservation. Hotels, resorts, airlines and cruise operators have powerful financial incentives to maximise occupancy and consumption, while governments remain reluctant to impose restrictions that could undermine employment and tourism revenue. Yet genuine sustainability would require precisely these compromises: limiting visitor numbers, curbing commercial development and imposing substantial environmental costs on businesses. Expecting an industry structurally dependent on expansion to voluntarily restrain its growth is therefore deeply unrealistic.
• Insight: Remember to address “impossible”. The language for this view needs to emphasise the severity and inevitability of the problem. Also, it would be helpful to think more broadly about what sustainability being impossible entails (to address more scope – in the examples chosen), i.e. destroying ecosystems and biodiversity, increasing carbon footprint, depleting resources, mounting pollution and waste, overcrowding and degradation etc. And as usual, recommended examples would involve concrete case studies. In this case, specific countries and tourism destinations. GP values case study examples over trivial ones like research and statistics. Students who rely on numbers will not score well. Our ZA content focuses entirely on rich case studies that can be applied across many questions!
• Disagree (Env sustainable tourism is possible) = 1. Tech innovation can mitigate harms – The environmental footprint of leisure travel need not increase proportionately with the number of tourists, as technological advancements create opportunities to make transportation and accommodation considerably more sustainable. The development of sustainable aviation fuels, more energy-efficient aircraft and electrified ground transport can progressively reduce the emissions associated with tourism. Meanwhile, hotels can incorporate renewable energy, water recycling and more efficient waste-management systems into their operations. Although these innovations cannot eliminate tourism’s environmental costs overnight, they demonstrate that expanding travel and reducing its ecological footprint are not inherently incompatible. | 2. Economic incentives can encourage conservation – Tourism does not necessarily have to come at the expense of environmental preservation; when properly managed, the economic value of natural attractions can incentivise governments and businesses to protect the very ecosystems upon which their livelihoods depend. Rather than viewing conservation as an obstacle to commercial development, destinations can recognise that degrading their natural assets ultimately undermines their long-term economic appeal. Entrance fees, conservation levies and eco-tourism revenue can therefore generate funding for habitat restoration and wildlife protection, making environmental preservation an economically viable component of the tourism industry.
• Insight: Every GP question always has 1 positive view and 1 negative view, and realising that makes thinking of arguments way more intuitive. For instance, the view here is actually thinking about the negative problems that come with online monitoring.
• New vs Tweaking: We don’t focus on Environment because it is ranked behind the other 5 main Themes. Read up more about the various Themes over here. However, if you prepare for Env questions, these are very standard too because they relate to problems and solutions (which is the biggest focus area that includes several related sub-topics).

5. ‘Countries where people speak more than one language experience only advantages.’ Discuss. | Rating: Difficult

• Why it exists and what it entails: Would not recommend. Many students can look at this and think: “oh that’s Singapore”; while that is true, you need to know at least 5 other multilingual countries and should be using different languages (instead of for eg looking at only english and chinese). Realistically, most students probably do not have this niche content knowledge. You may not discuss more than 1 SG eg in a question that isn’t “in your society”. Remember, good essays must have at least 6 distinct examples in the entire discussion, ideally we aim for even 8 so that we get 2 examples per body paragraph.
• Another question trap is ignoring the given condition “speak more than one language”. Some students may try and discuss how monolingual countries are still advantageous, but that actually hijacks the question because it is only interested in multilingual countries and whether that yields only advantages.
• And then of course, this is also difficult due to the absolute modifier of “only advantages” where we need to prove there are no drawbacks while we discuss this view.
• This exists as part of the larger debate on whether there is value for countries to educate their population in multiple languages, given that it could end up compromising a deeper specialisation, and would also incur more costs.
• Students may also only discuss individual impacts, which is wrong as well since the scope is countries
• Agree (Multilingualism = only advantages) = 1. Economic competitiveness – A multilingual population is an invaluable economic asset in an increasingly interconnected global economy, with linguistic diversity offering countries a competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate. Individuals who command different languages enable businesses to negotiate directly with overseas clients, cultivate international partnerships and penetrate foreign markets without relying heavily on intermediaries. This is particularly valuable as companies expand into unfamiliar markets where cultural sensitivity is just as important as commercial expertise. Since proficiency in additional languages expands rather than restricts an individual’s professional capabilities, multilingualism equips a workforce with a wider range of opportunities and strengthens a country’s capacity to attract investment. | 2. Cultural understanding and social cohesion – The ability to speak different languages can strengthen social cohesion by allowing individuals to engage meaningfully with communities beyond their own. Since language provides a gateway into another community’s history, values and customs, multilingualism encourages people to appreciate cultural perspectives rather than remain confined within the assumptions of their own upbringing. Crucially, learning another language does not require individuals to relinquish their mother tongue or cultural identity; both can coexist. Linguistic diversity can therefore enrich a shared national identity, allowing citizens to develop mutual respect without demanding cultural uniformity.
• Insight: Even within these arguments, we should already address the absolute “only”. We do this by emphasising why the benefits are substantial + how they invalidate the costs or concerns.
• Disagree (Multilingualism = also disadvantages) = 1. Complicating governance and integration – A country with numerous linguistic communities may find it harder to establish effective communication between its government and population. Public policies, legal requirements and national campaigns must reach citizens across different linguistic groups, necessitating extensive translation and multilingual administrative arrangements. More significantly, the absence of a widely shared language can impede the development of a common national identity, as citizens remain more closely connected to their respective linguistic communities. This can make it harder for governments to foster social cohesion and mobilise the population behind shared national priorities. | 2. Accelerating the erosion of cultural heritage – Multilingual societies can paradoxically undermine their own cultural diversity when certain languages become disproportionately dominant. As governments prioritise languages with greater international or economic value in education and public life, smaller indigenous and heritage languages may gradually lose their relevance in everyday communication. Over generations, this can lead to the disappearance of traditional languages and the cultural knowledge embedded within them, weakening the country’s historical identity. The loss extends beyond vocabulary: oral traditions, indigenous knowledge and distinctive cultural practices may disappear alongside the languages through which they were transmitted.
• Insight: Realising that we can Tweak from Politics migration + Arts loss of heritage would give us the necessary arguments. More broadly, it is realising that this is not just  a matter of languages but also the deeper concern of it representing the identities and culture of groups. 
• New vs Tweaking: Although this is a niche question, our essay from Politics (topic of Migration) actually fit quite well, and that informed how I thought of these points. Usually, multiple languages are associated with multiple social groups, which is why we can think along the lines of integration, diversity, heritage etc (A2, D1, D2). Only A1 is something that is unique to this question and the most obvious point that must be discussed. You can see the power of studying for the right content, in a Thematic + Topical way, because we can use that for even more difficult questions! 

6. How successful is your society in encouraging greater involvement in the arts? | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: This is a common question that looks at the treatment of the arts in Singapore, in particular the efforts undertaken to promote the arts. 
• ‘In your society’ questions are much more common for the Theme of Arts + Indv Values (possibly also because they simply have way more questions than other Themes).
• Importantly, for “in your society” questions, the Points themselves MUST already address Features of Singapore (i.e. unique characteristics that shape the Singapore context and affect this particular topic being discussed). A Feature is NOT an example, a feature is a broad, insightful observation of the society rather than a specific instance of something.
• We should also try to examine the outcomes, rather than only discussing the intentions of policies because success is contingent on tangible outcomes that can be seen. That being said, we can still favour case study examples. It is not true that we must bring in numbers; we can do so selectively but we can still highlight case studies that include government policies, art initiatives, venues, programmes, specific art forms and a cluster of some of these works etc. Remember, case studies are the best kind of examples and this is an important insight most students don’t know!
• Agree (Successful in encouraging greater involvement) = 1. Democratising access – Singapore has made considerable progress in democratising access to the arts, ensuring that cultural engagement is not confined to affluent audiences or individuals with specialised artistic interests. The government has invested heavily in cultural infrastructure and made a conscious effort to bring artistic experiences within reach of the wider population. This is particularly significant in a densely populated, urbanised society where access to cultural amenities can be facilitated through centralised infrastructure and extensive public transport connectivity. By lowering practical and financial barriers to participation, Singapore has made it easier for ordinary citizens to incorporate the arts into their lives.| 2. Institutionalising arts appreciation through education – Singapore has also sought to cultivate an appreciation of the arts from a young age by embedding artistic exposure within the formal education system. Rather than treating the arts as an extracurricular indulgence, schools provide students with structured opportunities to explore different artistic disciplines and develop their creative abilities. This is particularly important in an academically competitive society where parents and students may otherwise prioritise subjects perceived to offer more tangible educational and career returns. By making artistic exposure part of students’ formative years, Singapore can nurture a generation that is more receptive to the arts and more likely to sustain an interest in them beyond school.
• Insight: These give a comprehensive engagement for “greater involvement”, where it’s not just having more opportunities to do so, but also enhancing the quality of it. In the examples, we have more room to look at actual outcomes by discussing the visible improvements.
• Disagree (Unsuccessful in encouraging greater involvement) = 1. Pragmatism undermines artistic engagement – Singapore’s pragmatic, achievement-oriented culture continues to place considerable emphasis on academic excellence and economic productivity, often at the expense of artistic pursuits. In a highly competitive education system, students are frequently encouraged to prioritise subjects and qualifications perceived to offer more secure career prospects, while parents may regard the arts as a supplementary interest rather than a worthwhile long-term pursuit. This mindset can discourage young Singaporeans from developing their artistic abilities or considering creative careers, limiting the extent to which exposure translates into sustained involvement. | 2. Limited public appreciation for local and traditional art forms – Singapore continues to face difficulties in cultivating a deeper appreciation for its local artistic heritage, particularly among younger generations who may gravitate towards more commercially popular forms of entertainment. The declining familiarity with traditional art forms, compounded by diminishing fluency in heritage languages and dialects, can make certain performances and cultural expressions increasingly inaccessible to younger audiences. This weakens the transmission of artistic traditions between generations and suggests that greater exposure to the arts has not necessarily translated into a sustained appreciation of Singapore’s distinctive cultural identity.
• Insight: We cannot discuss just any negative aspects of the arts in Singapore. For instance, a point about censorship is wrong because the question’s premise is efforts to encourage, which means we evaluate the effectiveness of measures (and in this view, look at the challenges and limitations), rather than a broad pros & cons evaluation of Singapore’s art scene.
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays, as well as insights from Singapore AQ Examples we have discussed. D2 is the most different, and comes from another topic in the Arts too – Heritage.

7. ‘What people wear establishes their identity.’ Assess this view. | Rating: Difficult

• Why it exists and what it entails: Fashion and clothing types of questions are closely linked to the arts, but it still remains quite a niche topic. And when it comes to niche topics, the challenge is being able to have 6 such examples. Once again, these examples should not be limited to cliche generic descriptions of what people wear. We need much more in-depth and technical knowledge of clothing: traditional, cultural, formal vs informal, costumes and cosplay, fast fashion, branded and luxury goods, non-conforming or experimental etc.
• This question is also difficult because usual questions look at the value of fashion, whereas this has a very specific claim on how it relates to identity. Better scripts will have a much more nuanced definition of identity, which I will explain below.
• Agree (Establishes their identity) = 1. Signaling social and cultural belonging – Clothing serves as a visible marker of the communities and cultural traditions with which individuals identify. Through distinctive attire, people can express their ethnic heritage, religious convictions or affiliation with particular social groups, making aspects of their identity immediately recognisable to others. This is especially significant in increasingly multicultural societies, where dress can preserve a sense of cultural continuity even as individuals navigate different social environments. What people wear therefore does more than fulfil a practical function; it communicates where they come from and the communities to which they feel they belong. | 2. Personal values and individuality – The clothes people choose can also reveal their personal convictions, tastes and values, allowing them to construct an identity that distinguishes them from others. Individuals may deliberately reject prevailing fashion trends, embrace particular aesthetics or select clothing that reflects their personal beliefs. In an age where personal expression is increasingly valued, dress becomes a means of asserting autonomy and communicating one’s worldview without necessarily having to articulate it verbally. Clothing thus helps individuals shape how they understand themselves and how they wish to be perceived by others. (I am thinking about queer identities, or cosplay, or choosing pre-loved clothing over fast fashion because of environmental consciousness etc.)
• Insight: Important GP knowledge relating to cultural identities, queer identities, and basically subjective ideas of identities. I would discourage cliche and generic points that talk about identity as basic professional identities because there is nothing very interesting about such arguments, and it would not allow for much personal voice either. In GP, even if many arguments are valid, it’s important to prioritise either what is more important for the topic (requires in-depth content knowledge of this issue to discern), or what is more unique. 
• Disagree (Does not establish their identity) = 1. Social conformity and external pressure – What individuals wear is often dictated by the social environments they inhabit, rather than the identities they wish to express. Dress codes, religious requirements, workplace expectations and prevailing fashion trends exert considerable pressure on individuals to conform, making clothing a reflection of the norms they operate within rather than their personal convictions. Indeed, people may deliberately suppress their preferred styles to avoid appearing out of place or attracting unwanted scrutiny. Clothing therefore frequently reveals the expectations society imposes upon individuals, rather than the identities they independently construct. | 2. Identity is much more holistic (values, experiences, character) – Ultimately, what defines an individual is not the clothes they wear, but the values they uphold, experiences they have accumulated and convictions that guide their actions. Although attire can communicate certain aspects of one’s background or preferences, it cannot reveal the deeper principles that shape an individual’s worldview or moral character. Two people dressed identically may possess profoundly different beliefs and personalities, while someone can radically transform their appearance without undergoing any corresponding change in character. Clothing may influence how others perceive an individual, but it cannot independently establish who that person truly is.
• Insight: Sometimes points form a natural rebuttal like D1 vs A1 (because it is about whether the motivation behind clothing comes from something intrinsic or extrinsic). That is perfectly okay, and that is the beauty of GP where both views can be valid and it is up to how we argue and clarify our premises. Mature discussions will be able to pinpoint that whereas weaker scripts will simply sound contradictory.
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays, but more from logic rather than an entire point, since this question is still quite niche. For instance, we have many examples looking at culture and heritage, LGBTQ+ rights, political pressure exerted on individuals etc.

8. ‘The development of science and technology is limited only by human imagination.’ Evaluate this claim. | Rating: Standard

• Why it exists and what it entails: This is probably many students’ preferred question, given the popularity of Sci Tech. It aligns nicely with the Prelim trends also, where we saw many questions interested in the futuristic technologies and the latest advancements. 
• However, understanding how to ATQ can be difficult. My tip for this is to always write clearly what it means to agree and disagree with the question (especially when a long phrase is given in the question). Agree here = Limited only by human imagination. In other words, with imagination we can do anything with Sci & Tech. Disagree = Limited also by other factors. There are real and practical limitations that prevent imagination from achieving everything. 
• Agree (Establishes their identity) = 1. Transcending existing knowledge and boundaries – Humanity’s inability to conceive of possibilities beyond established scientific understanding can be its greatest impediment to progress. Scientific breakthroughs often require researchers to challenge prevailing assumptions and question theories previously regarded as unquestionable. Without the imagination to envisage alternative explanations, scientists would remain confined to refining existing knowledge rather than pursuing fundamentally new discoveries. What appears impossible may simply reflect the intellectual limitations of a particular era; as humanity expands its understanding of the world, previously inconceivable possibilities become legitimate avenues for scientific exploration. | 2. Creative innovation overcomes existing constraints and provides alternatives – Even seemingly formidable obstacles to scientific progress can be overcome when researchers imagine unconventional solutions that transcend established methods. Limitations in existing technology, materials or resources need not represent permanent barriers, as human ingenuity can continually discover alternative approaches to achieving the same objectives. By combining existing knowledge in unexpected ways, reconfiguring technologies for new applications or devising entirely novel methods, scientists can overcome constraints that previously appeared insurmountable. In this sense, material and technological limitations are not necessarily the ultimate boundaries of progress; they can themselves become problems that imagination enables humanity to solve. 
• Insight: Here, I am thinking broadly about what the development of Sci & Tech could look like, and I decided to approach it from an angle of knowledge and theories, to actual innovations and inventions. 
• Disagree (Does not establish their identity) = 1. Ethical and political considerations – Scientific development is not simply a matter of discovering what humanity can achieve, but also deciding what it should be permitted to pursue. Certain technologies may carry profound ethical implications or threaten public safety, prompting governments and international institutions to restrict their development regardless of their technical feasibility. This is especially relevant as biotechnology and artificial intelligence increasingly grant humanity the capacity to manipulate biological processes and influence human behaviour. Even when scientists possess the imagination and technical expertise to realise such possibilities, concerns over exploitation, discrimination and unintended harm may justify prohibiting or limiting their application. Scientific progress is therefore shaped by societal values, not just human ingenuity. | 2. Material and economic constraints – Even when scientists can envision viable technological breakthroughs, their development may be hindered by the substantial financial, material and infrastructural resources required to realise them. Advanced research often demands specialised equipment, rare materials, highly trained personnel and years of experimentation, placing ambitious projects beyond the reach of countries or institutions with limited resources. This is particularly consequential because scientific advancement is not determined by intellectual ingenuity alone; without the necessary investment and industrial capabilities, even promising discoveries may remain confined to laboratories or theoretical proposals. Humanity’s ability to imagine progress does not guarantee its capacity to finance and implement it. 
• Insight: For questions with a forced comparison Absolute (i.e. only, most, greatest), when we disagree with it, we must discuss other variables that contrast with it. In this question, we look at other constraints that restrict the development of science and explain why these could be more substantial that just a lack of imagination.
• New vs Tweaking: All 4 points are tweaked from our standard model essays. But this question (and many A Level Sci Tech questions are like that as well) requires drawing knowledge from several different topics/essays within Sci Tech. A1 A2 comes from essays discussing the potential of futuristic tech, what freedom allows tech to do, and why the purpose of research can be driven by knowledge and results. D1 is a very standard point that looks at why Sci Tech needs to be restricted. D2 is something a bit more unique to this question, to consider why imagination alone might not be enough to fuel all our scientific dreams.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Yay, congratulations to the J2s of 2026, because you have completed an important milestone. Good job on putting in your best effort for GP. Now it is time to take a short break and refocus your efforts on Compre + other remaining subjects. Stay motivated and stay confident 😄!!

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you found this helpful, do check out our GP Tips & Resources Telegram Channel! Click here to join. This channel is meant to act as a GP companion to share knowledge and help all students, regardless of whether they are a part of ZAscension. This resource features Tips of the Day, Answers to FAQs, Articles and many more. So if you enjoyed this article, this channel will definitely be useful for you 😃

Do share this article and also the Telegram channel with everyone you know who is also studying for GP, let’s share the good stuff so that we may all learn 🙂

Don’t worry, that’s why we are here to help! 

Find out more about the writer, Mr Zach!

WhatsApp 9722 3187 (click to contact) to sign up for lessons!

  Check out our GP Tips & Resources Telegram Channel! Click here to join.